Coming Soon ...

While you wait ...

Evidence Left Out of the Documentary

Detailing Kathleen's Post Conviction Theory - Planting the RAV

From Council to Witness - Dean Strang and Jerry Buting Take the Stand to Testify at Avery's Post Conviction Hearing (Part One: The Corruption of His Honor

Excerpt from post:

No judge enjoys having his rulings overturned, I would say that much is agreed upon by almost anyone and everyone. So if we accept that as true, when the time comes, an opinion or a ruling should, IMO, always be re-examined on appeal by a separate judge, and preferably one that will suffer no (or very little) political / personal backlash for overturning any opinions / decisions that appear as an obviously dysfunctional result of the Justice System.

Main focus of post:

This post goes over DS and JB post conviction testimony, where in they discuss Willis' role in the removal of a deliberating juror without cause, which violated Avery's right to a jury trial as the federal and state constitutions guarantee.
DS JB and the excused juror all testify. They are they to show how his removal was improper. In this case the allegations revolve around Willis and Pagel.

Judge Willis: My reading, without pressing him with questions too specific, was that he felt the future of his marriage was at stake if he was not excused.

Mahler's testimony established that there was no family emergency. The future of Mahler's marriage was not at stake.

From Counsel to Witness - Dean Strang and Jerry Buting Take the Stand to Testify at Avery's Post Conviction Hearing (Part Two: The Destruction of the Defense Via Denny)

Excerpt from post:

Dean and Jerry are still being questioned by attorney Hagopian. At this point during the hearing she is focusing on questions concerning the effect the Denny ruling had on their (DS and JB) defense of Avery.

I never realized before the multitude of ways in which Denny had hindered Dean and Jerry's usual defense strategy.

Main focus of post:

This post also goes over DS and JB post conviction testimony, but instead of focusing on the excused juror, part two draws attention to the many ways in which the Third Part Liability ruling hampered DS and JB defense strategy.
Due to the content of their testimony, part two puts heavy focus on S. Tadych and Bobby (there is a fair bit of theorizing in this post).

S Hagopian (Avery's post conviction counsel): Another individual was Scott Tadych, who was the State's witness; do you recall Mr. Tadych?

Dean Strang: Oh, yes.

Comments: 7

#7
Sverre Heggelund (Tuesday, 14 June 2022 10:27)

Right from the start I have said that there are 2 Toyota rav4. I think TH went to Zipperer after SA. therefore miss Zipperer says she was there at 15.00 pm. AC and his colleagues find the car not far from Zipperer. that's when the AC calls it in, which is one of the big mistakes mtso makes. you hear in the background of the phone call, that someone is shouting, the car is here. they also register it as found. Nov 3 dark green Toyota amber 4. Therefore, I believe that TH was either taken by days of old Zippers. or right after she left them. This is because old Zippers were very aggressive in their tone towards Mtso when they made contact. And the phone call from TH to Zipperer disappeared completely without a trace after it got into Mtso's hands.
#6
Carol Sherwood (Friday, 03 June 2022 17:30)

Well, I thought I was sending you a message privately and not posting my cell phone to the universe. LOL If you see this, please delete my previous post. Thanks!
#5
Carol Sherwood (Friday, 03 June 2022 17:23)

I want to talk with you. Your presentations are EXACTLY what I prefer to read and they are no nonsense. I have MUCH to add and would like to write with you. I've just started my blog series on Steven Avery and just established a new FB page dedicated to their innocence. The hardest part is where to begin. LOL

Feel free to call my cell phone 903-603-4459 or email me at carolclinesherwood@gmail.com

This is great stuff!!!
#4
Sam (Sunday, 14 June 2020 06:59)

Wow these are all really good. The longer the better it seems. I'm more confused now than ever, but I still feel that they were both framed. Such a sad story.
#3
Greg (Sunday, 10 May 2020 23:21)

Thanks for doing all this hard work, Dude. You definitely did quite a bit of homework in order to produce this, and the production itself took a great deal of time, I'm sure. Are you still adding updates to this site? If not, too bad for everybody ... on the other hand, if you have terminated such efforts, I certainly understand ... Doing this kind of work is what I would call a Herculean Effort applied to a Sisyphean Task. I appreciate the hard work that you put into this, and I can assure you that since it will benefit my edification, you certainly did not "do it all for nothing".

Having browsed around a little bit more just now, I can see that I'm going to have to read everything that you have posted. E.g. I just found a little gem (pasted at the end here) entitled Calculated Moves from the page entitle "Ricciardi, Demos and Zellner".

I couldn't agree more with your sentiments there, especially after I (just now, for the first time!) read the Motion to Limit Public Disclosure that Dean and Jerry filed with the court on March 8, 2006 . I am still amazed at the amount of self-restraint employed by Dean and Jerry in order to remain "diplomatic" while all that Press Conference "shit" was going on. I have often thought to myself that had they not insisted on always taking the High Road, maybe things would have gone better for Avery. I certainly hope that my speculation is incorrect.

----------------- Copied and Pasted from "Calculated Moves" --------------

Shortly after March 2, 2006 DS and JB said, "Alright, enough of this shit."

On March 8, 2006 the defense filed a motion asking the Court to limit public disclosure of information/opinion about this ongoing case.

The motion largely focuses on the actions of Kratz and Pagel.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks again!
#2
Tina (Sunday, 14 July 2019 12:52)

They believe she was raped and cut kneck and stomach. Yet no blood only stevens girlfriends found. No one can clean a murder up that easy there would have been some blood even a lot. That should free brendan. Because his confection does not make sence ????? And the cars confusing hope kathleen can bring it up and blow the whole court up with the truth. X
#1
Robert coggins (Friday, 18 January 2019 16:41)

Great way to put this case all together, I'm with you on all accounts I've been following since it all came out, so hard to believe they got away with so much corruption! Hope they rot in hell for doing what they did to SA and BD.